Breaking the Scroll Spell
The Discipline of Knowing Less, Living More
If the article resonates, forward this to a friend who still thinks doomscrolling counts as research :)
Introduction
We have an information problem. Not because we don’t have enough, but because we have too much, all the time. News, updates, opinions, alerts… it never stops. The story we have told ourselves is that we take this input to feel “informed.” Yet the result is that we end up distracted, anxious, and overloaded. In The 4-Hour Workweek, Tim Ferriss offers a simple antidote to this slow drift into dissatisfaction: stop consuming, start acting.
And I agree. Most people have a ready list of reasons why they “need” constant connectivity: “it’s my job,” “Spotify is too important,” “I need maps to get anywhere,” “what if someone needs me?” These justifications feel reasonable (and some are), but they often mask a deeper dependency. We’ve grown accustomed to input over action, reaction over creation. Few even attempt a day without their phones, let alone a week. It feels too risky, too inconvenient, too important.
Today, I want to share two simple practices you can try this week to start reclaiming your agency and designing a life that brings joy to you, not profit to someone else. I hope these small changes help you move from passive consumption to active creation.
Low Information Tuesdays
Pick a day of the week, say Tuesdays. During those 24hrs, commit to step away from news, social media, text messages, and the constant stream of digital input. Tim Ferriss calls this selective ignorance: a deliberate break from the noise that overwhelms our minds daily. Instead of consuming, create. Ride your bike. Sculpt something. Walk a trail with no headphones and let your thoughts roam free.
It’s a tough practice in the 21st century, especially because big tech has trained us to believe that constant information is the cure for boredom. But the truth is, boredom isn’t a problem to solve; it’s a gateway. It’s the key that unlocks your brain’s capacity for original thought. As Manoush Zomorodi, author of Bored and Brilliant, explains in her TED Talk, “It turns out that when you get bored, you ignite a network in your brain called the default mode… This is when we connect disparate ideas, solve some of our most nagging problems, and do autobiographical planning.” In short: boredom makes room for brilliance
When we reduce the flood of input, we create space for deeper thinking, clearer priorities, and more meaningful action. The goal, after all, isn’t to eliminate information altogether. It’s to stop letting it run the show. Once you’ve practiced the discipline of dedicating one day to creation over consumption, the next step is to cut the junk. Not all input is equal and learning to tell the difference is where agency begins.
The 3 Source Limit
If you pause to audit the kinds of information algorithms feed you, a pattern quickly emerges: most of it is noise. Rage-bait headlines, out-of-context debates, and content designed to trigger our most primal instincts: sex, food, status, fear. Cal Newport calls this cognitive clutter, and he’s right. It fragments our attention, clouds our thinking, and leaves us mentally exhausted. The more we consume, the less we actually process. It’s like trying to drink from a firehose and wondering why we still feel thirsty.
That’s where cutting junk information comes in. Low Information Tuesdays give your brain a break from the constant stream, but the rest of the week needs a different filter. Instead of letting every notification or headline shape your day, choose a few trusted sources that actually align with your values. Lately, I’ve been limiting myself to just three sources of input per day. I also theme my days to help my brain gain consistency and predictability. Thursdays are for catching up on financial news. Sundays are for planning. Mondays are for sports score updates and so on.
History offers a clear warning about the cost of unfiltered information. In the lead-up to the Spanish-American War, newspapers driven by profit flooded the public with sensationalized and often false reports of Spanish brutality in Cuba, a practice known as yellow journalism. These emotionally charged stories stirred outrage and helped push the United States into war through manipulated reactions. It’s a reminder that when we let algorithms or unchecked media shape our attention, we risk being pulled into narratives that serve someone else’s agenda, not our own.
Conclusion
Despite what the influencers say, reclaiming your attention isn’t a trend. These offline practices aren’t about self-help or optimization. They’re about remembering that our time is finite, our focus is precious, and our lives were never meant to be managed like a dashboard. When you step away from the noise, even briefly, you begin to hear what’s been drowned out for too long: your own voice, steady and clear. And maybe, like a traveler who finally turns off the GPS, you start to notice the road itself: the texture of the path, the quiet turns, the signs you were meant to follow all along. That’s where the shift begins. That’s where you start living like it matters.


Great piece, Jose!
I wrote this short tweet with some thoughts I had after reading it: https://x.com/innovatias/status/1972900341734854678
Keep the great writing going! You are one of the fews Substacks I follow and actually read.
Great article, but what do you mean by limiting yourself to 3 sources of input a day? So an example might be YouTube, a newspaper app, and the third could be Substack or podcast app?